Summer conferences

This summer I traveled to two conferences.

The first was the International Workshop on Breast Imaging, held at Emory University in Atlanta, GA. It was a small conference, with just one series of talks. I really like that kind of format: you don't have to worry about fear of missing out (FOMO) on talks you want to hear, and it is a little easier to get to know people. I gave a talk on understanding how biopsy affects using radiomics for imaged-based classification of breast lesions. A highlight was our conference dinner at the Fernbank Museum of Natural History (seen above in the picture), where I got to chat with the representatives from Planmed, who are from Finland.

Later, I went to the annual meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, held in Nashville, TN. It was a big treat to get to back to where I lived for grad school and my first teaching job, although the city is has changed so much since then. I gave a poster presentation of my work on using deep learning to classify breast lesions by molecular subtype. Poster formats are changing up all the time. I was assigned an "ePoster", which involved submitting a powerpoint slide version of my poster a few weeks ahead of time, which was magically transformed into sections that I could zoom in on by touching a button. I felt a little like Vanna White, but I think it did help facilitate discussion in some novel ways. Plus, it is always nice to not have to lug a poster tube around. A highlight of AAPM was seeing a college classmate who is now a medical physicist in Michigan and a former research student of mine who is now in medical physics graduate school.

Classes at Wheaton don't start until August 29, but that doesn't mean I'm in vacation mode. Right now the lab is working on tomorrow's SPIE Medical Imaging 2019 abstract deadline, and then I hope to get two manuscripts submitted by the start of classes for peer review. Busy but good times.

Is a PUI registration fee category possible for conferences?

I'm really fortunate in how well my collaboration is going. We've had several conference abstract acceptances for my work and am hoping for more. Before the collaboration, I would go to 1-2 conferences per year, and the costs would generally fit within my institutional faculty development grant allotment, helped dramatically by the fact that one conference was in Chicago and had no registration fee, due to my AAPM membership. 

However, in this calendar year, I have attended one conference already and have three more to attend for the remainder of the year. And the costs are stacking up. Here's an outlay of the conference registration fees I will have for the year, even after taking advantage of early registration savings, one-day rates when I can swing it, etc.:

Conference 1: $815
Conference 2: $575
Conference 3: $695 (I'm sneaking in with the one-day rate, $340)
Conference 4: free (but I otherwise pay $447 for yearly membership, out of my personal funds)

Registration fees for conferences 1 and 2 are more than my faculty development grant fund amount from my college for the entire year. These costs listed above do not include airfare, hotel, and food. And they're lower than they could be, because I pay more than $1000 out of personal funds each year for professional society memberships. I have some remaining funds from my start up that I can draw from, but that won't last forever. My department chipped in to help with costs for Conference 1, but they of course can't do that for everything, and the other faculty members deserve any additional support we can give them as well. Another obvious place for getting funds is from fringe funds from grants, but I haven't yet been able to land an external one (although I'm feeing a teensy bit positive about my last application round).

In short, these costs are really tough for faculty from primarily undergraduate institutions! Travel costs, such as airfare or food aren't controllable from a faculty status perspective, but I wonder if conference fees could be.

A natural question is to wonder if I really do need to go to "all these" conferences. In my mind, yes. One focuses on imaging from a clinical perspective, one on the field of medical physics primarily from the view of physicists, a third is broadly about medical imaging, and the fourth is a biennial gathering focused solely on breast imaging. These are all elements of what it means to be involved in medical imaging.

 I know absolutely nothing about planning and executing conferences, but I wonder: is there a place for a middle tier of registration costs for faculty at PUIs, somewhere between trainee and full faculty cost? If you have experience planning conferences, especially large-scale mainstream science ones, I'd love to hear about the plausibility.

Spring 2018 Review

 My presentation at SPIE Medical Imaging 2018. Image Credit: Hui Li

My presentation at SPIE Medical Imaging 2018. Image Credit: Hui Li

With one final exam yet to administer, the Spring 2018 Semester is almost completely done. It has been a very busy, but very fulfilling semester.

Spring brings a whirlwind of abstract deadlines in the medical imaging community. Since January, I have prepared two conference proceedings papers, given a presentation (at SPIE Medical Imaging), written six conference abstracts (two have been accepted, four pending review), and sent in revisions on a manuscript and had it accepted (update on that soon!). It's all a big increase in productivity for me compared to my pre-tenure time, when I was completely solo. My collaboration at the University of Chicago has been very fruitful and really fun. I enjoy working with the group and I love that there is an opportunity for me to contribute (with my imaging physics background) and for me to learn (deep learning! statistical interpretations of imaging beyond model fitting! and so much more.) I am really grateful for the opportunity to be associated with the Giger Lab. 

My courses were fairly uneventful. None of them were new, but as always, there are approaches to revise and even a chance for me to understand the material better. Next academic year brings some new preps, as I will be teaching what we call an "advanced integrative course" on the physics of sound (which replaces my old physics of music course) and my department's new data analysis and presentation course (we finally split our two-credit-hour advanced lab-type course into two, two-hour courses). And this fall I am looking forward to my husband getting some adjunct hours in our department, because he will be teaching the labs for a course for which I am the course instructor. I love teaching with him. I'm biased, but we make a good team. I'll need to shake a bit of dust out of my brain, though, because I haven't taught first-semester intro physics since 2014, I believe.

Blogging has been light because of the many good things of this semester, but I hope to get back to it. I keep going back and forth between not believing I have anything valuable to throw out to the blogosphere, and remembering what it was like, pre-tenure, to feel like I might be the only one feeling challenged by this process. Even now, as a parent in a male-dominated field (and department) things feel off sometimes, harder than they should be, so I'm still stumbling about in some ways. And I constantly feel guilt from being on the employed side of our two-body problem. So we'll see where the blog leads. At the very least, I want to share more about research, as it has become a very fulfilling part of my academic (and personal!) life. I'm really excited about the work I am able to produce, especially because I am currently carrying a full teaching load. It is not easy, but it is fun. It brings some tensions of living between two worlds (for example, one-day registrations at two conferences this summer will take up more than half my academic year's faculty travel grant money from my institution) but I have been so energized by the work, and I am so grateful for the opportunity of my collaboration. I can't wait to share more.

Tell your students about the 2018 Summer Fellowships from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine has announced its call for applications for its 2018 summer undergraduate fellowship programs. I want to make sure as many physics professors as possible know about this offering. The announcement usually comes out a bit later than the NSF REU announcements, and so I think it can get missed.

If you have a student even marginally interested in medical physics, I hope you will let them know about the opportunity. You can click on the image above to go to a program flyer.  In addition to the program linked to in that image, there is another wonderful program, the Diversity Recruitment through Education and Mentoring (DREAM) program. Click the image below to go to the flyer for the DREAM program.

And here is a link to the full webpage. (Scroll down to get to the undergraduate fellowship information.) 

There are several nice features about the programs. The stipends are $5,000 and the ten week term can be flexible, determined by the student and the faculty sponsor. The deadline for student applications is February 2, 2018.

RSNA 2017 presentation, and thoughts on taking students to conferences

 Our presentation during RSNA. The room wasn't *that* empty, but indeed there were not 4200 people interested in the talk. (photo credit: Allen Newton. Hurrah for grad school friends who will come and sit through a long session on research that doesn't really relate to their own work.)

Our presentation during RSNA. The room wasn't *that* empty, but indeed there were not 4200 people interested in the talk. (photo credit: Allen Newton. Hurrah for grad school friends who will come and sit through a long session on research that doesn't really relate to their own work.)

Yesterday I gave a talk at the 2017 meeting of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago, IL on some research that I have done with my sabbatical lab. The work itself actually started before my sabbatical officially began. In January 2017, one of my physics students (the first author on the abstract) was in a mathematical modeling course and the instructor solicited faculty to see if they had projects the students might work on for their course. I was wanting to work on a project to jumpstart my sabbatical research, and the Giger lab had the data ready to go for this assessment, so it was a good fit. Nathan worked on the project from January-May 2017, going to the University of Chicago occasionally to talk with the collaborators. I joined in a few times but was limited due to my course schedule (and then my foot injury), and we also called in to some conference calls. We submitted the abstract to RSNA in April and then I took over the project, reviewing, revising, and finalizing our research, preparing the poster and the slides for the talk, and writing a manuscript for publishing our results. 

I've attended RSNA most years since starting at Wheaton -- I mean, there's a world-class medical imaging conference every year within driving distance, why not? -- but it is the first time I have presented at it. When I applied to and interviewed at Wheaton, it was clear that I would have to give up doing (magnetic resonance) imaging at my home institution, as it is just not a good fit for a liberal arts institution to have magnetic resonance imaging on campus. It was a tradeoff I was willing to make, because I think there are interesting quantitative imaging questions to ask at the spectrometer level, as you can get out the factors related to the imaging itself and focus on factors that affect magnetic resonance of the substance in question. But I did miss imaging tremendously. Thankfully, I did find out about a colleague in our Applied Health Science department who does ultrasound imaging, and we formed a collaboration and published. But I've been really glad for the sabbatical work and the connection to clinical questions and methods as part of a bigger research endeavor. 

So, giving the talk and presenting our poster was great, but get this: every year I invite my students (broadly - I'm talking every physics and engineering student in our department) to attend RSNA. They can go for free, which is an amazing opportunity. They don't even need to go every day; I ask them to seriously consider going just one day. But in my eight years at Wheaton, only three students have gone without it being required as part of a course (I require my Introduction to Medical Physics students to attend the conference). This year, no one came at all. It baffles me. I've asked some students about this, and the reason is almost always that they feel pressure to understand through and through every single talk they attend, that they are afraid a vendor will ask them a question they don't understand - which sounds to me like it boils down to imposter syndrome. Then, I try to explain to them that I don't always completely understand the ins and outs of every single talk I go to, that the posture of a physicist (or really anyone in research) is to constantly be learning, and that's good. And they seem totally unconvinced.

I've been thinking about this: it's a weird dynamic that students experience, to be in classes where they are graded on mastery of topics, and then be thrown into the research world and be told that the professionals are always learning. That must be very confusing to college students! So I don't quite know how to bridge this gap. (Throw in there gender issues about how students perceive female faculty saying they don't know something versus male faculty saying the same thing, and it gets even stickier.) 

Friends, how do you encourage conference participation by your students, even just attendance if that opportunity comes up? How do you coach them into balancing pursuit of excellence versus taking on the posture of a learner?  

RSNA 2017 Presentation and Poster

I am thrilled to share that I will be presenting a poster and doing an oral presentation at the 2017 Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America later this month. I’ll be presenting on the “Additive Benefit of Quantitative Radiomics in Distinguishing Between Benign Lesions and Luminal A Cancer Subtypes on a Large Clinical Breast MRI Dataset.” The research was done in collaboration with the Giger lab at the University of Chicago, where I have been working while on sabbatical. The first author is Nathan Taylor, an exceptionally bright student at Wheaton College. 

 A screenshot of our title and author list. 

A screenshot of our title and author list. 

I'm especially thrilled because I am grateful for the opportunity to collaborate with Dr. Giger's lab. The U of Chicago personnel on our abstract have all been great to work with, encouraging and challenging at the same time. I don't want to presume too much, but I think presentations and posters from liberal arts institutions don't happen very much at RSNA. So I'm very, very excited to be presenting there.