Is a PUI registration fee category possible for conferences?

I'm really fortunate in how well my collaboration is going. We've had several conference abstract acceptances for my work and am hoping for more. Before the collaboration, I would go to 1-2 conferences per year, and the costs would generally fit within my institutional faculty development grant allotment, helped dramatically by the fact that one conference was in Chicago and had no registration fee, due to my AAPM membership. 

However, in this calendar year, I have attended one conference already and have three more to attend for the remainder of the year. And the costs are stacking up. Here's an outlay of the conference registration fees I will have for the year, even after taking advantage of early registration savings, one-day rates when I can swing it, etc.:

Conference 1: $815
Conference 2: $575
Conference 3: $695 (I'm sneaking in with the one-day rate, $340)
Conference 4: free (but I otherwise pay $447 for yearly membership, out of my personal funds)

Registration fees for conferences 1 and 2 are more than my faculty development grant fund amount from my college for the entire year. These costs listed above do not include airfare, hotel, and food. And they're lower than they could be, because I pay more than $1000 out of personal funds each year for professional society memberships. I have some remaining funds from my start up that I can draw from, but that won't last forever. My department chipped in to help with costs for Conference 1, but they of course can't do that for everything, and the other faculty members deserve any additional support we can give them as well. Another obvious place for getting funds is from fringe funds from grants, but I haven't yet been able to land an external one (although I'm feeing a teensy bit positive about my last application round).

In short, these costs are really tough for faculty from primarily undergraduate institutions! Travel costs, such as airfare or food aren't controllable from a faculty status perspective, but I wonder if conference fees could be.

A natural question is to wonder if I really do need to go to "all these" conferences. In my mind, yes. One focuses on imaging from a clinical perspective, one on the field of medical physics primarily from the view of physicists, a third is broadly about medical imaging, and the fourth is a biennial gathering focused solely on breast imaging. These are all elements of what it means to be involved in medical imaging.

 I know absolutely nothing about planning and executing conferences, but I wonder: is there a place for a middle tier of registration costs for faculty at PUIs, somewhere between trainee and full faculty cost? If you have experience planning conferences, especially large-scale mainstream science ones, I'd love to hear about the plausibility.

Spring 2018 Work by Time of Day

In my last post, I shared where my work time went over the Spring 2018 semester. I was curious about when I was doing most of my work, so I broke down the numbers even more. I was interested in knowing how much I spent working before 8 AM, between 8 AM - 5 PM ("normal" working hours), between 5-8 PM (work that would have been going on during the critical kid hours of dinner, bath time, and bedtime), and after 8 PM.

Where did the (Spring 2018 work) time go?

I enjoy reading materials by Laura Vanderkam about managing time. She is a big advocate for tracking time, among several other strategies, especially in light of the fact that most people overestimate the time they spend in different activities (especially work). By tracking your time, you can think objectively about how to change things up. 

I've done a few time tracking challenges in the past, usually for durations of one week. This past spring, I decided to track my time for the whole semester.

Spring 2018 Review

My presentation at SPIE Medical Imaging 2018. Image Credit: Hui Li

My presentation at SPIE Medical Imaging 2018. Image Credit: Hui Li

With one final exam yet to administer, the Spring 2018 Semester is almost completely done. It has been a very busy, but very fulfilling semester.

Spring brings a whirlwind of abstract deadlines in the medical imaging community. Since January, I have prepared two conference proceedings papers, given a presentation (at SPIE Medical Imaging), written six conference abstracts (two have been accepted, four pending review), and sent in revisions on a manuscript and had it accepted (update on that soon!). It's all a big increase in productivity for me compared to my pre-tenure time, when I was completely solo. My collaboration at the University of Chicago has been very fruitful and really fun. I enjoy working with the group and I love that there is an opportunity for me to contribute (with my imaging physics background) and for me to learn (deep learning! statistical interpretations of imaging beyond model fitting! and so much more.) I am really grateful for the opportunity to be associated with the Giger Lab. 

My courses were fairly uneventful. None of them were new, but as always, there are approaches to revise and even a chance for me to understand the material better. Next academic year brings some new preps, as I will be teaching what we call an "advanced integrative course" on the physics of sound (which replaces my old physics of music course) and my department's new data analysis and presentation course (we finally split our two-credit-hour advanced lab-type course into two, two-hour courses). And this fall I am looking forward to my husband getting some adjunct hours in our department, because he will be teaching the labs for a course for which I am the course instructor. I love teaching with him. I'm biased, but we make a good team. I'll need to shake a bit of dust out of my brain, though, because I haven't taught first-semester intro physics since 2014, I believe.

Blogging has been light because of the many good things of this semester, but I hope to get back to it. I keep going back and forth between not believing I have anything valuable to throw out to the blogosphere, and remembering what it was like, pre-tenure, to feel like I might be the only one feeling challenged by this process. Even now, as a parent in a male-dominated field (and department) things feel off sometimes, harder than they should be, so I'm still stumbling about in some ways. And I constantly feel guilt from being on the employed side of our two-body problem. So we'll see where the blog leads. At the very least, I want to share more about research, as it has become a very fulfilling part of my academic (and personal!) life. I'm really excited about the work I am able to produce, especially because I am currently carrying a full teaching load. It is not easy, but it is fun. It brings some tensions of living between two worlds (for example, one-day registrations at two conferences this summer will take up more than half my academic year's faculty travel grant money from my institution) but I have been so energized by the work, and I am so grateful for the opportunity of my collaboration. I can't wait to share more.

Faculty sponsorship programs at small colleges

Faculty sponsorship programs at small colleges

Have you heard of professional sponsorship? I think most faculty have heard about mentoring programs for pre-tenure faculty, even if they don't exist at their own institution. Mentoring in general is ill-defined, but it usually involves someone being available to advise someone who is coming up the ranks. Sponsorship is different. The unique quality of such a relationship, as I understand it, is that the sponsor agrees to take an active role in the advancement of the sponsored person, helping them network, recommending them for opportunities, that sort of thing, with the understanding that both the sponsor and the sponsored person will benefit from career advancement. You can read more about sponsorships in this article, and find others by googling. 

Tell your students about the 2018 Summer Fellowships from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine has announced its call for applications for its 2018 summer undergraduate fellowship programs. I want to make sure as many physics professors as possible know about this offering. The announcement usually comes out a bit later than the NSF REU announcements, and so I think it can get missed.

If you have a student even marginally interested in medical physics, I hope you will let them know about the opportunity. You can click on the image above to go to a program flyer.  In addition to the program linked to in that image, there is another wonderful program, the Diversity Recruitment through Education and Mentoring (DREAM) program. Click the image below to go to the flyer for the DREAM program.

And here is a link to the full webpage. (Scroll down to get to the undergraduate fellowship information.) 

There are several nice features about the programs. The stipends are $5,000 and the ten week term can be flexible, determined by the student and the faculty sponsor. The deadline for student applications is February 2, 2018.

Semester start up checklist

Semester start up checklist

I want to formalize a start up checklist that I will aim to use at the start of each semester. My goal is to reduce the amount of time I spend wondering what to do next, to make clear to myself what depends upon others (frankly, so I can bug them to make things happen!), and to make my semester start up more efficient but understanding what tasks I can batch together. (Right now, for example, I am running some code on a cluster and waiting for a revised dataset to come my way, so writing this blog post and thinking about my checklist is a good use of my time.)

As a physics professor at a small teaching-focused institution, with no lab staff (yet - we have a job opening for this!), I find that I have to take on a lot of tasks that are not usually done by faculty at larger institutions. For a long time I have felt like much of what is published online about being a professor ignores this level of work needed for being a physics professor - so I'm sharing here in case my list helps others and so others can chime in with suggestions.

Here's my list so far. 

Blogging Best of Both Worlds: Episode 17, Gender

This week's episode of the podcast Best of Both Worlds was broadly on Gender, although a good bit of the discussion was on gender expectations at work and home, and gender expectations that can be present in toy design and selection.

I'm a physicist so the issues of gender expectation are not unfamiliar to me. I don't have the bandwidth or brain space or ability to write about the issues of gender in physics in one blog post, so I will not attempt to do so. The only thing I would add on that topic is to trust a woman in physics when they say they have faced issues related to their gender. I would also add that men face gender assumptions as well in physics, often assumptions that they will be very aggressive in leveling up in employment or in badgering for a position, or that something is wrong if they are not. We would do well in physics to avoid gender stereotypes for anyone.